• RSS
  • Archives
  • Likes
  • What are you scared of?

SPIKE//

stuff and nonsense
contact me at loscheiner at gmail dot com


September 19, 2011 • 49 notes • Comments

A Typeface for Dyslexics

thekeri:

Christian Boer, a typographer at the firm Studiostudio, based in the Netherlands, has designed a special font for people with dyslexia. The font, called “Dyslexie,” uses specially shaped letters to exaggerate some of the differences between letters that dyslexics find hard to see.

How well does it work? A master’s thesis by Renske de Leeuw at the University of Twente shows that the font boosts accuracy, but not reading speed; although there are certain words that are now harder to read than before, the net effect is positive. What’s needed now, de Leeuw explains, is a more robust research program, testing specific changes to the letterforms to see which ones help dyslexics and which ones don’t. You can get a sense of some of the ways in which typography might help by looking at detailed images of the font here.

No. No. No. 

Let’s start at the beginning. Like at the beginning of this dumbass video, which states that people with dyslexia view letters in 3D. This assertion is patently false. I’m not even sure I understand what it means, though it reminds me of the time I saw an ad for HD sunglasses. 

There is nothing wrong (or 3D-enhanced) about the visual perceptive system of a person with dyslexia. People with dyslexia play sports, watch movies, drive cars. Some wear glasses, some don’t. Dyslexia is not a visual-perceptive problem. It is a language problem. Unfortunately, people who don’t know much about language - like the typographer who created this new dyslexia-solving font- don’t understand this.

The author of this paper and creator of the font, bases his work on the magnocellular deficit theory. The magnocellular deficit theory states that people with dyslexia have a visual-perception impairment. The impairment reduces contrast sensitivity and therefore makes it hard to track objects in space (e.g., words on a page during reading). Certainly there are people who have a magnocellular deficit (and other types of visual impairments) that would make reading difficult. However, the evidence that people with dyslexia have this kind of deficit is incredibly sparse (see Skottun, 1999 for a review).

There are proven physiological differences in the brains of dyslexic and typical readers but visual perception is not one of them. One study (Vellutino, 1975) examined English-speaking children with dyslexia. The children were asked to transcribe unfamiliar Hebrew characters. The children had no difficulty with the task. Although the symbols were “letters” they had no linguistic value to the children. This tells us that children with dyslexia have no problem with interpreting or rotating abstract symbols. It’s only when those symbols are associated with language that a problem arises. 

 Dyslexia is a condition where there is a weak association between the form of the letter (grapheme) and its corresponding sound (phoneme). Yes, people with dyslexia often confuse similarly shaped letters (e.g., b/d/q/p), but they have other problems as well. I worked with a boy with dyslexia for over a year. He very often confused “wh” and “th” (e.g., “when”/”then”). Obviously, “wh” and “th” look nothing alike. What was happening was a confusion between the symbols and the sounds they make. The boy knew that the two letters together made a single sound, either /w/ or /ch/- a good first step. He just wasn’t sure which sound was which, because he had trouble creating a link between the graphemes and the phonemes. 

 This author’s new font purports to improve reading accuracy by making letters more dissimilar. By that logic, we could simply teach children with dyslexia to only use capital letters or cursive, which tend to be more different. But, since dyslexia is not simply a problem of visual discrimination, this tactic doesn’t work. Children with dyslexia have trouble with capital letters and cursive, too! (Again, because they have a poor association between the symbol and the sound). Unfortunately, the rest of the world typically does not use crazy fonts, cursive, or capslock. How functional is a reading treatment if it only works when you use a single font? People with dyslexia need to learn the sound-symbol association regardless of font.

Lastly, this author’s research shows that the new “dyslexie” font did not enable children to read faster than a normal font. This is a huge problem. Almost all people with dyslexia read painfully slowly. We say that they are nonfluent readers. Imagine reading each word in a sentence at a very slow pace, taking time to sound each word out, re-reading words many times over. Try it. It…. macks. makes com..com…comp..pre..hen. comprehensh.comprehension. hear possible. no, wait, nearly improssible. Impossible. Get it? The slowed rate of dyslexic reading puts an enormous strain on working memory. If you can’t read fast enough to remember a sentence from start to finish, you will not understand the meaning of the sentence, let alone a longer passage.

Everything about this is bad, from the science the theory is based upon to its potential for therapeutic implementation. What helps children with dyslexia is systematic, explicit, multisensory phonics instruction. Not papyrus and comic sans.   

(Source: abbyjean)

  1. missclaudslp liked this
  2. cassandy liked this
  3. dgspeechie reblogged this from lindsaygrace
  4. lindsaygrace reblogged this from loscheiner
  5. mslilyb liked this
  6. emmeh liked this
  7. emmeh reblogged this from butterpockets
  8. fallingdeep liked this
  9. alphalux liked this
  10. thekeri reblogged this from loscheiner and added:
    In which Lolo gives input from her area of expertise.
  11. ceeana liked this
  12. effacentatious liked this
  13. 1260hours reblogged this from loscheiner and added:
    My friend from grad school, Lolo, was kind enough to pass on this video, and more importantly, her response. This girl...
  14. zombiecuddle liked this
  15. michellegajkowski liked this
  16. southtwelfth liked this
  17. sleepswithfishes liked this
  18. satwaitedwished liked this
  19. sirjolt liked this
  20. kynodontas liked this
  21. reaganing liked this
  22. tragicallyaverage liked this
  23. nostrich liked this
  24. alexwhines liked this
  25. pforu liked this
  26. monkeytypist liked this
  27. shablahblah reblogged this from loscheiner and added:
    Somewhere, I can hear Scott Schwartz screaming in rage at the insanity of this “treatment,” and thus its almost...
  28. loscheiner reblogged this from thekeri and added:
    No. No. No. Let’s start at the beginning. Like at the beginning of...dumbass video, which...
  29. danbronson reblogged this from abbyjean
  30. t33j liked this
  31. butterpockets reblogged this from abbyjean
  32. unfinite reblogged this from abbyjean
  33. helloniki liked this
  34. soffee reblogged this from abbyjean
  35. cantarelgallo liked this
  36. indaff reblogged this from abbyjean
  37. curvedcurvis liked this
  38. abcsoupdot liked this
  39. vicarious5 liked this
  40. se-smith liked this
  41. contemplatingchicken liked this
  42. thekeri reblogged this from abbyjean and added:
    Holy shitsnacks, this is really cool.
  43. zoe-dotdot reblogged this from abbyjean
  44. louque liked this
  45. reinventionoftheprintingpress liked this
  46. political-linguaphile liked this
  47. abbyjean posted this
Designed by Sleepover